Vera Rubin's Numbers

Evidence for dark matter is visible in this elegant set of simple charts, rooted in data published decades ago

Jen Christiansen

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Credit: Jen Christiansen

Earlier this week, astronomer Vera C. Rubin died at age 88. Rubin’s research on galaxy dynamics provided groundbreaking evidence for the existence of dark matter. 

As Rubin told Discover Magazine in 1990, “Fame is fleeting…My numbers mean more to me than my name. If astronomers are still using my data years from now, that’s my greatest compliment” (from “The Woman who Spins the Stars,” by Marcia Bartusiak, in Discover, October 1990).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In honor of Rubin, here are a few of her numbers.

First, just a bit of context, from her 1983 article on dark matter for Scientific American:

“ROTATION CURVES show orbital velocities of nine Sc galaxies from the center outward. Galaxies increase in luminosity from top to bottom. With increasing luminosity galaxies are larger, orbital velocities are higher and velocity gradients near the galactic center are steeper.” Graphic by Gabor Kiss, for “Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies,” by Vera C. Rubin, in Scientific American, June 1983. SOURCE: “Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/,” by V.C. Rubin, W.K.J. Ford, and N. Thonnard, in Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 238, June 1, 1980. Credit: Jen Christiansen

“It has been known for a long time that outside the bright nucleus of a typical spiral galaxy the luminosity of the galaxy falls off rapidly with distance from the center. If luminosity were a true indicator of mass, most of the mass would be concentrated toward the center. Outside the nucleus the rotational velocity would fall off inversely as the square root of the distance, in conformity with Kepler’s law for the orbital velocity of bodies in the solar system. Instead it has been found that the rotational velocity of spiral galaxies in a diverse sample either remains constant with increasing distance from the center or rises slightly out as far as it is possible to make measurements. This unexpected result indicates that the falloff in luminous mass with distance from the center is balanced by an increase in nonluminous mass.”

“Our results, taken together with those of many other workers who have attacked the mass question in other ways, now makes it possible to say with some confidence that the distribution of light is not a valid indicator of the distribution of mass either in galaxies or in the universe at large. As much as 90 percent of the mass of the universe is evidently not radiating at any wavelength with enough intensity to be detected on the earth. Originally astronomers described the nonluminous component as “missing matter.” Today they recognize that it is not missing; it is just not visible.”

Memorable data, for sure. I also intend to remember her name.

To read more by Rubin, see “The Dynamics of the Andromeda Nebula,” in Scientific American, June 1973.

Jen Christiansen is an information designer, visual science communicator and author of the book Building Science Graphics: An Illustrated Guide to Communicating Science through Diagrams and Visualizations. She began her publishing career in New York City at Scientific American, moved to Washington, D.C., to join the art department of National Geographic, spent four years as a freelance science communicator and then returned to Scientific American for a second stint, during which she became the magazine’s first graphics-specific art director. In that role, she established a consistent data visualization and diagram philosophy across all articles. She writes and presents on topics ranging from reconciling her love for art and science to her quest to learn more about the pulsar chart on Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures album cover. Her work can be viewed at www.jenchristiansen.com

More by Jen Christiansen

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe