New Issue: Orbital Catastrophe Ahead? Read Now

NASA spots the possible remains of a massive supernova in the middle of the Milky Way

If the supernova remnant is confirmed, it would be one of the closest to the supermassive black hole that lies in the center of the Milky Way

a composite image of colorful, overlapping clouds, which suggests to astronomers that a supernova remnant may be buried in gas near the center of our Milky Way galaxy

X-rays from Chandra and XMM-Newton, radio data from the MeerKAT telescope in South Africa and an optical image from the Pan-STARRS telescopes in Hawaii.

NASA

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory has captured a dramatic scene about 26,000 light-years away from Earth. Scientists suspect it could be a supernova remnant, the violent shock wave and cloud of debris sent hustling through space after a massive star dies. Scientists estimate the possible supernova remnant is expanding at a rate of two million miles per hour and is at least 1,700 years old.

Supernovas are a key part of the galaxy’s ecosystem—when they explode, they release elements that are key to the birth of new stars and planets. If confirmed to be a supernova remnant, it would be one of the closest remnants ever found to the supermassive black hole in the central region of the Milky Way.

In the new composite image seen above, the galaxy runs left to right. The long filaments that are mostly perpendicular to the galaxy are energetic particles traveling along magnetic fields. Another image layered with James Webb Space Telescope data shows a close-up of the potential remnant, located in Sagittarius C, an active star-forming region near the center of the Milky Way.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Sagittarius C, close-up image adding NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope data to the X-ray and radio data.

A close-up image of Sagittarius C that adds NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope data to the x-ray and radio data.

NASA

Scientists think the object may be the remains of a supernova because x-ray data suggests there is a “bright blob” inside Sagittarius C. That blob matches many of the known characteristics of a rapidly expanding supernova remnant, according to a recent study in the Astrophysical Journal. The data come from NASA’s Chandra, as well as the European Space Agency’s XMM-Newton mission, South Africa’s MeerKAT telescope and the Pan-STARRS telescopes in Hawaii.

The possible remnant is inside what is known as the HII region of Sagittarius C. This type of region is a special bubble of gas that forms when radiation from hot, young stars strips the electrons from hydrogen atoms, making clouds of ionized hydrogen.

This isn’t the first time data have suggested a supernova remnant exists in Sagittarius C. Older data from NASA’s now-retired Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) mission hinted at the presence of an expanding shell of gas around Sagittarius C, and the new study strengthens the case. Scientists typically expect to see elevated levels of specific elements around supernova remnants, however, which is not the case here. Still, that may be because the debris from the explosion has already mixed with the surrounding gas.

The bright blob could also stem from a collection of massive stars in the region, but the study authors argue this is less likely because it’s far brighter than nearby stellar clusters.

Subscribe to Support Independent Journalism

Great science journalism requires human expertise, time, effort and creativity. And it costs money. That’s why I and the journalists here at Scientific American hope you’ll join our community.

When you subscribe, you are supporting staff and freelance journalists who are passionate about telling science stories that are true, important and compelling. Our editors and reporters are often experts in their fields, which means they understand the nuances of big discoveries and can untangle the breakthroughs from the hype. With a subscription, you are also supporting rigorous fact-checking to ensure the words we publish are precise and accurate. And you’re supporting original illustrations, graphics and photos that bring you closer to an advanced laboratory, an ice sheet in Antarctica or a space mission in orbit. You’re helping us craft other types of high-quality journalism as well: Our newsletters are carefully written, edited and curated by staffers you have or will come to know and love. Our Science Quickly podcast is based on original reporting, collaboration with editors and scientists and exacting production.

Subscriptions keep this engine running so we can continue to deliver thoughtful, rigorous and independent science journalism to you. In an era of viral misinformation, this work is crucial. If you value what we do, I hope you’ll consider joining us as a subscriber

Thank you,

Jeanna Bryner, Editor in Chief, Scientific American

Subscribe